Should every state have a sanctuary city

Sanctuary city is a municipality that limits or denies its cooperation with the national government in enforcing immigration law.

Santcuary cities could be good for an increase in population and they have lower than average crime rates alot of the time household income is higher in sanctuary cities

most of the poeple who live in sanctuary cities are Higher in the economy and are no where near poverty.

 

I think that every state should have a sanctuary state it could help support our economy and help people who are having a hard time with basic living costs.

 

 

You need to be a member of History 360 to add comments!

Join History 360

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Should every state have a sanctuary city? I think that every state should have a sanctuary city. This is because they have more population, lower crime rates and they make more money. 

  • I don't think that there should be sanctuary cities or at least only some. Because having a lot of people coming into this country, who know what they could manage to bring over. But there are also some advantages. The crime rate would go lower. We would need federal law to actually keep a good eye on the city to make sure nothing goes wrong.  

  • I think some states should have a secoundary state but not all of them. I think it is bad since they can cause a lot of illegal immigrants since they can sneak easily. It can also be good though since it lowers crime rates and house income is higher.

  • I agree that every state should have a sanctuary city. It can build a stronger community and help those who are in need of support and refuge. It is also good for the economy.

  • I think that there are advantages and disadvantages to having sanctuary cities. They are nice to have because as you said, in places where there are sanctuary cities the crime rate is lower and the household income is higher.

  • I think yes and no because there would be a lower crime rate, but it would be limiting people and leaving people out, due to the rich living there, and not poverty.

  • Every state should have a sanctuary city because it is better for the United States. Like you said they have low crime rates, higher income, and lower poverty levels. I think a sanctuary city could help a lot of people who are not able to afford the necessities and it could also help the economy.

  • I think that sanctuary cities are not good and we should not have them. We should not be allowing people who came into our country illegally to stay here and live off of our resources.  This would encourage more people to come into our country illegally and that is not good.

  • Santcuary cities could be good for an increase in population I agree with this but i also think that the allow millions of bad people into the country. most of the poeple who live in sanctuary cities are Higher in the economy and are no where near poverty. this is jsut not true!!! most of our homless live in these citys

  • I think having a sanctuary city would make more illegal immigrants think that sneaking into our country is a good thing. Illegal immigrants could bring bad things into the US that we do not need, maybe even another terrorist attack. It's just more dangerous to have sanctuary cities for undocumented immigrants to hide away from federal law. 

This reply was deleted.
eXTReMe Tracker