The meeting between the US and north koera if now being but in jerprady after they threatened to withdrawl if Washington insisted on “unilateral nuclear abandonment.” they were stating rejectment of trump administrations demand that it quickly dismantle its nucular program like lybia 15 years ago.announcement came hours after the state worned that it might be cancled to protest joint military excersises.
questions
1)what do you think of this
i feel that this could destroy all the work they have done in building a realationship
2)do you think that nuclear abandonment is a bad thing? why or why not?
i think that its bad becuase it lessesns deturence for both countrys and they have showed recently that they are willing to work.
Replies
I don't think that north korea is going to fulfill the summit and back out at the last second. They are changing suddenly and not really helping the realationship with the united states.
1) I feel that North Korea will hopefully still show up to the meeting still so then they can get all of these conflicts resolved. 2) It could be a good thing and a bad thing all in general but when it comes to North Korea i feel that between there threats to use nuclear weapon on the U.S that they do not deserve to have these powerful weapons of mass destruction in there control.
i agree with you on the fact they we both want them both to still show up. i could see it alos being a good thing aswell because they could go back to not liking us again and then they could fire nukes at us.
Yes i respect your opinion on this topic because i can also see where your coming from and i feel that no matter what happens both country's will find out a way for them to not like each other very much.
i just wonder why they really wanted total nuclear abandonment? i mean like, they said they were going to stop testing so for now i would just take that and make it better. rather than just ask for total denuklearization.
I just dont feel that either side will always feel 100% safe when the other country has these powers, but i also feel that North Korea is all talk beings that we have 1,000's of nuclear warheads and they dont have very many.
i think that even if they dont have many warheads they can still hit us and do a lot of damage becuase just one warhead can do a ton of damage . im just worried that they will disagree and start a new war over again.
Well yes i agree but they do have to relize that we could totally destroy them in a straight up nuclear war beings that we have the land, the people, and the resources to mass produce and destroy North Korea.
yeah we do have the people and the resorces to mass produce them but i still think that the lose of life would be too great and we would be better off just invading them rather than starting a nuclear war. because the death tole of that would be far greater that an invation.
Yes i agree but you also have to see that in war there are always alot of casualties in war but i do agree there would be so much more casualties if nukes were to be used.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next