5. Describe the differences between the New England, Middle and Southern colonies in their development.
New England: (consists of Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Connecticut) Because it was settled by Puritans, who left England for religious reasons, it's architecture was made to look similar to that of England's. The Puritans weren't very welcoming to other religious views, so this became cause for other immigrants to settle elsewhere, and further explore America. Later, New England was in the lead with progressive development, with factories, railroads, canals, and the such. Outside the cities, many people lived on sustenance farms. The population was the highest of the 3 sections, and people were crowded together in most places (designed similar to England, where it was also very crowded and densely populated). Eventually this led to an advantage in politics too, when Abe Lincoln won his election, and slavery was abolished, etc.
Middle: (consists of New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York, and Delaware) The smallest section; more diversity in people and leniency in their religious views, also in architecture, although it still resembled England style with cities. The soil in the middle colonies was richer and less rocky than the soil in New England, and commercial farming for grains, like wheat, although sustenance farming was still common. While New England progress was mainly with factories, etc, the Middle colonies had success with ship-building and ports; thanks to this, it was easiest for them to have contact with Europe, and to be trading colonies. Other than that, the middle colonies were an economical mix of the Northern and Southern colonies. Politically, most of their views were a sort of mix between the north and south again, although for the civil war they mostly sided with the north.
Southern: ( consists of Virginia, Maryland, South Carolina, North Carolina, and Georgia) Wealthier settlers, more grand and less crowded, more spread out architecture (since the people generally owned more land). The Southern colonies had a smaller population than New England's, but with equal power due to certain people having more money and land per person. The soil here was richest, so large farms (plantations) thrived, and sustenance farms were less common. Progress here was less developed overall, since farming was the main occupation, but the economy was more active thanks to the products farmed on plantations, and slave trade. Politically, they had running battle with the north on a regular basis, which eventually led to the first political parties.
Honestly, for this topic, I didn't know which kind of development I was supposed to research, so I sort of just tried to keep it simple and general. In a way, that made it both easier and harder to research, because there was a lot to write about, but I could narrow down an overview of what I considered important, more or less. And, actually, I remembered half this stuff from middle school, but I did look it up to make sure my info was accurate.
Sources....mainly wikipedia, but there was also some other stuff, like info from the history books from middle school that my subconsious memory decided was useful enough to keep. And the pic of the colonies wasn't from there either, but, oh well. I don't remember where I got it (i'm editing this in class, since I forgot to put down my sources last night)
Anyways, here's some pics on which states were where, and an example of a Victorian-style house, which is what you'd see a lot of if you went to the 13 colonies, or England.
The 13 colonies; New England in black, Middle in white, Southern in stripes.
Victorian style.
Comments