Should we have bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

             Relations between Japan and the U.S. were anything but good before, during, and after WW2. Tensions were high even before the beginning of WW2. In 1931, Japan was seeking to find raw materials to fuel its growing industries, so it invaded the Chinese providence of Manchuria. By 1937, Japan controlled large parts of China, and war crimes against the Chinese people were common. In 1934, Japan ended cooperation with many of the big powers across the world. Japan was criticized by the U.S. and many other world powers. 

            Relations only worsened when Japan took control of Indochina, intending to capture oil from rich areas in the East Indies. The U.S. responded to this by placing an embargo (ban or trade on activity with another country) on scrap metal, oil, and aviation fuel going to Japan, and stopped Japanese assets in the U.S. The U.S. commanded Japanese forces to withdraw from areas in China and Indochina. Japan began to plan an attack on Pearl Harbor by April 1941.

            On December 7, 1941, Japanese forces bombed the U.S. naval base Pearl Harbor, officially bringing the U.S. into WW2. Japan sunk many ships, destroyed hundreds of planes, and killed thousands of people. Japan’s goal was to weaken the U.S. fleet, and they almost succeeded. The American people were shocked and angered. During the war, the U.S. hopped from Island to Island. The Japanese were good fighters and every fight was more costly and claimed more lives. The last major battle was the fight in Okinawa, it lasted 3 months and took at least 100,00 lives.

            President Roosevelt (the president during the war) passed away in on April 12, 1945, and President Truman was now in charge of how to end the war. The president and his advisors thought of invasion but it would be too costly. President Truman had heard of the Manhattan Project, a secret scientific effort to make an atomic bomb. After a successful test of the bomb, Truman issued the Potsdam Declaration and demanded a surrender of the Japanese government, warning them of “prompt and utter destruction.” Eleven days later there was no reply. The President decided to drop the bombs. On August 6, Enola Gay took a route to Japan and dropped a bomb on Hiroshima at 8:15 pm. In the first few minutes, there were about 80,000 deaths, and thousands of others died from radiation sickness. On August 9, we dropped the second bomb on Nagasaki. 39,000 people were killed and 25,000 were injured. Japan then surrendered to the United States. 

            In my opinion, I think that we were right in dropping the bombs. They attacked us first, killed many people, and damaged lots of our equipment. They also refused to surrender when the war was over. I can see both sides, but I believe we did what we needed to do.

 

https://www.trumanlibrary.gov/education/presidential-inquiries/decision-drop-atomic-bomb  

 

Q1. Do you think we should have bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

Q2. Do you think President Truman did the right thing?

You need to be a member of History 360 to add comments!

Join History 360

Email me when people reply –

Replies

    • I agree with you. It is very possible that we would still be dealing with Japan if we hadn't dropped the bombs.

  • I can see why we bombed japan but i think personally violence is never the answer. I realize that they killed many of our countries soldiers and innocent people but i feel bombing them back might of made things worse.

    • Although, I can see why you would think that the problem is we were in a war that wouldn't stop until somebody won and because of the bomb Japan surrendered if the bomb didn't drop then violence would've have continued for a lot longer.

    • You said that, " I feel bombing them back might of made things worse." But after we bombed them it led to them ending the war and they didn't retaliate so it didn't make things worse, I ended a terrible war and those two city's were the last casualties. 

This reply was deleted.
eXTReMe Tracker