In between 1972 and 1985, Mary Beth Tinning of New York, was qestioned about the suddened deaths of all of her kids. At first she claimed that all of the kids death were natural or suddened infant death syndrome. No one had thought it was odd that all her 9 kids had passed away before any of them tured 4, what all made the investigators wonder if it was all natural was even the little boy she was trying to adopt was dead as well. So, after having her 9th baby and after the baby had died everyone stated to wonder aht as really going on. In 1987, the investigators had come to conclusion that she had been murdering her kids since 1972( when the first baby was born). After the figured out that she had murdered her kids she had told them that she liked the feeling of killing. She was sentenced to prison for life, but after spending 72 years in prision she is being released from prision in 2018, but is on proal for the rest of her life.
How do you feel about her getting released?
I think its a bad idea becasue she could do it again if she likes the feeling of people dying, also someone could make her mad she could want to hurt that person.
Do you think she should of been released?
No becasue she killed all of her kids and she should be punshied for taking innocent childerens life for nothing.
Replies
Be sure to proofread to eliminate errors. I also think you could have replied more frequently. Also be sure to capitalize key words in your title.
I feel that she still needs to be in prison right now because she killed her own kids for no reason. No, she shouldn't have been released because she likes the feeling of killing so she could go kill more people and take there lives for no reason at all.
1 - I feel like she should not be able to be released from prison. She purposfully killed 9 people and didn't feel any remorse. She should not be able to live in society like a normal person because of that. My biggest question is why she even had the chance to be released in the first place.
I agree with you because even though she is on prarol she might want to do it again, and I don't think that she should be able to have a normal life after what she had done.
I don't think that the woman should have been released because she basically comitted murder 9 times. She should have a life sentence because obviously, if she 'likes the idea of killing', she will do it again. Additionally, mothers usually have special bonds with their kids, so if she killed them, then she doesn't really sound like she has limits.
I mean why even live if you're stuck in jail. I think it's weird to like the feeling you get when you kill, but it doesn't really surprise me somebody would be like that. I don't understand how it took years for them to realize she was killing babies!? Where is a system or somebody to prevent this?
I don't understand why they would release her when she was sentenced to life in prison. Especially when she committed a crime like that. She took the life of 9 kids before they turned 4. And even after she admitted she enjoys the feeling of killing someone, they still released her, this just doesn't make sense.
She was sentenced for life and she should stay in there. In my opinion 72 years isnt enough time for a crime like that. I don't think she should have been relased. I dont care if she had good behavior and feels bad she still did it.
I do not think she should be released for a couple reasons. One, her sentence is for life so she should have to serve the whole sentence. Second, she took the lives of innocent children that do not get to live the whole life so she should not get to enjoy any of hers. Third, she likes the feeling of people dying so what is to stop her from doing it again.
I do not think it is a good idea to release her because she could kill more people when she gets out of prison. Plus her original sentence was life in prison so I don't know why they changed that. I do not think she should have been released because she deserves to be in prison for killing all of her children.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next