In Tv interview the husband stated that he has no part in his wifes disappearance and he believes that she is still alive. In the televison show "Dateline" the conversation was recored before Fotis (the husband) was arrested and chared with tampering with physical evidence on Wednesday. Fotis was already facing earlier charges in connection with her disapearance. Fotis posted a $500,000 bind and was released from custody, his attorney states "Dulos will plead not guilty." When asked is he had anything to do with her disappearance he said "I did not, but i'd like to leave it at that."
Do you think he had anything to do with his wifes disappearance?
I believe that he could have had something to do with it other wise he would have answered the question and kept talking about it instead of avoiding it.
If he had something to do with the disappearance, why do you think he did it and do you think he had help
If he did do it I believe that he had help doing it because it would be hard try to get rid of your wife with 5 kids. Also, if he did do it I believe that he could of done it because he could have been seeing someone else and didn't want her finding out.
Replies
Interesting story! Be sure to capitalize key words in your title. In your summary, you should really start with what happened to the mom. You are assuming people know, which many won't. Also be sure to reply three different days instead of one.
I think it is a posibility that he had something to do with her dissappearance. I think if he did it he was probably drunk and did something stupid or was mentally unstable and mad at her and didn't want to deal with her anymore.
I think might have something to do with it because if he actually didnt have anything to do with it, he would try way harder to help the police find her, but he is not trying that hard to find her so it seems like he had something to do with it. They must have had some problems in their marriage and he saw this as the best way out and he could have some of his friends help me.
I think that he may have something to do with it. In a criminal investigation you should definetely try and be 100% TRUTHFUL So stuff like this isn't happening to you. If you would simply answer the question you wouldn't be in jail and have to post bond. I'm not sure if he had help but if he had something to with the apperances he probably didn't do it alone.
I agree with you, he should be helping to find his wife to being her back to her kids. I feel like if he nothing to do with it or even if he did, he needs to tell the police everything.
I think he did have something to do with her dissapearance. If the authorities found enough evidence to charge him with tampering with evidence, obviously he had a little to do with it. If he did have something to do with it, I would say they were probably having issues and this was the only way he could solve them. I do think he had help. If he told the police he didn't do it, maybe he didn't but he could have hired a person to take his wife.
I agree with you because they did find enough to charge him twice but he hasnt been found guilty and hasent been arrested for good. I think he should be chargerd for it for good and be put away.
He could be telling the truth when he says he has nothing to do with the dissaperence but on the other had he could aslo be lying about if he did it or not or if he knows what happend. If he did it then there has to be a reason he could be craszy or she cheated on him.
I believe that he is lying about it because if he cared about his wife then he should be helping find her and not avoiding questions because anything he tells the police could help find her.
I agree with you he might have something to do with it since he didn't wanted to keep talking with judge so that makes him look suspicious for avoiding the conversation instead of given evidence he didn't took part in his wifes disapparence . if he had something to do with the disapearence i think he maybe got paid for someone or he just wanted some kind of revenge.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next