The Comedian Amy Schumer and the model Emily Ratajkowski were arrested along with 300+ others during a protest. They were protesting against the new Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. Kavanaugh has been accused of various froms of sexual miscounduct. Hundereds of people went to the US Sented building to protest again the new nominee. The Police say they areested 302 people. Schumer and Ratajkowski say that men who hurt women shouldn't be placed in postitions of power.
Want to read the full story? Click Here!
Do you think that Brett Kavanaugh should be allowed to be placed in this postition?
Would you protest against this? Why?
Replies
Great job replying! I do think your summary is brief and you could have expaned a bit more by including your perssonal thoughts and opinions. Also be sure to capitalize key words in your title.
I think that he should be allowed because we have laws that say he can be. When people say he did rape her they are delusional. I believe in " innocent until proven guilty" this is meaning that he can't be accused if there is no evidence. There has been no credible evidence that has shown him doing it. I don't think their is a reason to protest if there is literally nothing true against him.
I feel like Kavanaugh should be placed in the Supreme Court position if he forgives of what he has done. Sexual miscounduct should never be something anyone does, but I also think that people change better or for worse and I think they need to make this decision of Supreme Court for themselves. No matter who it is, people are always going to protest and disagree about it, but that's life.
I think he should be allowed to take this posistion of power and not be critized about what he has done until he messes up and makes a mistake that involves something from the case he just got finished with then you can fire him .
I think that the women are telling the truth and I also think that if he was proven of it then he definitly shoud not have been put in the postiton. I personally do not like him even besides the fact of what women have said about him.
No because if he was doing that kind of stuff to women. I dont think thats fair to them. I think they have every right to do what they did. I dont think he does because what if he did do those nasty things to women. How would our country feel about that knowing he maybe did something to those women. Yes I would because I wouldnt be able to handle thinking maybe this man hurt women and no one is listening to them and there going unheared. I mean come on why do we treat women like this they do a lot in the household area and other amazing things. Give us some credit.
I do not agree with what you said, as we have laws that state someone is innocent until proven guilty. So that's meaing if there is no credible evidence......Which there isn't any ACTUAL CREDIBLE EVIDENCE. He shouldn't be hated or judged on something that's not true. Kavanaugh actually respects women, but sadly I don't think some people see this side of him. News nowadays is so one sided, left, funded by liberals. It's all fake and reporters choose what side of the story would benefit the lefts and that's what they report on. There were actually a letter of 65 women who all said that Brett Kavanaugh was a caring man and that he loved and respected women. I think that women are very useful and think that if their was credible evidence then ya President Trump would need to appoint a new supreme court nominee.
I agree with you. It is embarrassing to think people would respect him after what he has done to other women. I would also protest to show that women are not alone and can be heard.
Since there are no fully proven- or at least that we know of- things from either side I think it would hard to decide. Yet, I don't think someone with this much controversy about them should be able to hold that much power. I don't I would protest much because there is not much that can be done, he's already on the supreme court.
I have two sides, with all the doubt that people have, I don't think he should be. I also feel like he should because there is no proof of this stuff. I would not protest because I have both sides and I would not know what side to choose for sure.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
of 5 Next