When I read this story I think it was pretty dumb. A 12 year old got suspended for apparently touching her teacher inappropriately. The 12 year old was stretching and the teacher stopped behind her and the 12 year old accidently touched her teacher, who is also a lady. The consequence is a suspension for 180 days.
So now if you stretch and accidently touch your teacher you get suspended for 180 days? What are your thoughts? Who do you think is at fault? The teacher for stopping right behind the 12 year old? or the 12 year old for stretching?
Replies
And im guessing the teacher wanted to make a scene. I would so be pissed if my child got suspened for the dumbest thing.
i would have to say she probably would have to of done a little more than just stetching to get suspended like that but still it's a girl unless that girl likes girls there shouldn't even be a discussion over suspension
I think that the teacher is to blame for this predicament. All the kid was doing was stretching and the teacher just went up behind the kid and stopped it. It isn't the kids fault because he didn't know that she was behind him. As far as the suspension goes 180 days is an over reaction. I think that the kid should be suspended but not for 180 days I would say more like 2-3 weeks.
That is pretty dumb is was kind of the teachers fault because she stopped behind her while the girl was strecthing. 180 days really.
I don't think either are at fault. It just happened to be she stopped and she stretched. A whole year though is a little rash. Someone better do something for the girl to finish school and for the girl to start the next year.
i think this is really dumb, im pretty sure the kid didnt mean to touch his teather inappropriately if he was stretching. and i feel like the kid shouldnt be suspensed for 180 days, that is a little much