In my opinion, I don't think she should've been executed. She was only 17, a minor. The baby could've died naturally, maybe by SIDS.. they should have proved she killed the baby before they executed her.
You need to be a member of History 360 to add comments!
Replies
At first I thought this happened in America and I was thinking why would a minor be executed for something like that, but then i realized this happened in Saudi Arabia. They probably just assumed it was her and stopped looking for hard evidence.
She sounds like a crazy lady! I mean she shouldn't have strangled the poor baby so yeah i think executed was a little crazy but she shouldnt have done that.
This horrible! They needed more proof that she was the one that really did. I bet this baby died of SIDs it is common. I feel very bad for this girls family.
I don't think that she should have been killed but maybe punished in some way if they could prove she killed the baby
I don't think that she should have been executed and we know that in the US she wouldnt have been because of lack of evidence. We all know its wrong and yet we treated people the same way during the Salem Witch Trials a long time ago. She should have been able to stay in jail until she was actually proven guilty.
I don't believe in the death penalty, so if she did it she should've suffered the consequences and spent the rest of her life in jail.
People these days. I wonder why she did this....wonder if she just snapped? Anyways sounds like Saudi Arabia's sentencing is like an eye for an eye, well in this case a life for a life. I agree that killing her probably shouldn't have happened when she is just a minor.
I think that she shouldn't have been killed because the lack of evidence in this case. However, this was in Saudi Araba so this doesn't quite surprise me.